case laws of cartels in pakistan - An Overview
case laws of cartels in pakistan - An Overview
Blog Article
Extra username and password are required for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details
Some sites could possibly specialize in specific areas of regulation, even though others offer a broader database. Factors to look at when picking a website consist of the comprehensiveness of the database, the ease of navigation, along with the availability of advanced search options.
Case files might also be accessed from the public access terminals while in the clerk’s office of the court where the case was filed.
Some bodies are given statutory powers to issue guidance with persuasive authority or similar statutory effect, such as the Highway Code.
ninety four . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It can be perfectly-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within 90 days. When the appeal will not be decided within that timeframe, he/she will then method the service tribunal to challenge the original order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, because the 90 times for that department to act has already expired. Within the aforesaid proposition, we've been guided because of the decision with the Supreme Court from the case of Dr.
The case addresses An array of issues together with, environmental protection, and an expansive interpretation in the right to life.
Any court could seek to distinguish the present case from that of a binding precedent, to achieve a different conclusion. The validity of this kind of distinction may or may not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to some higher court.
This ruling has conditions, and Considering that the petitioners failed a qualifying Test, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based on the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above facts and circumstances on the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 with the Constitution. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-223999 Tag:Specified the legal analysis on the subject issue, we've been in the view that the claim from the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Preliminary contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle just isn't legally sound, Moreover promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They are really matter to rules and regulations When the recruitment rules of the topic post permit the case on the petitioners for promotion could be considered, however, we have been very clear in our point of view that contractual service cannot be considered for seniority and promotion as being the seniority is reckoned from the date of regular appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum check here Exercise, subject matter to availability of vacancy subject on the approval of your competent authority.
Finally, a vital contribution of this case which was accepted for consideration with the Court under Article 184 (3), has actually been setting a precedent which allows for much less difficult access on the public to approach the superior courts as well as subordinate courts on environment related issues.
This article delves into the intricacies of your recent amendment, accompanied by relevant case law, to provide a comprehensive understanding of its implications and sensible applications.
13309-B of 2010 being weak types of evidence along with the evidentiary value whereof would be viewed with the time with the trial. The investigation of this case has already been finalized and, Consequently, confirmed custody on the petitioner in jail is not going to serve any valuable purpose at this stage.”
dismissed as not pressed and sentences awarded on the appellant in this case is altered into imprisonment, which appellant has already undergone.(Criminal Jail Appeal )